The US Supreme Court again backed President Donald Trump's hardline approach toward immigration on Monday, letting federal agents proceed with raids in Southern California targeting people for deportation based on their race or language.
The court granted a justice department request to put on hold a federal judge's order temporarily barring agents from stopping or detaining people without "reasonable suspicion" they are in the country illegally, by relying on race or ethnicity, or if they speak Spanish or English with an accent, among other factors.
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision, directing pointed criticism at its conservative majority.
The administration "has all but declared that all Latinos, US citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents' satisfaction," justice Sotomayor wrote in the dissenting opinion. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent," Sotomayor added.
Los Angeles-based US district Judge Maame Frimpong found on July 11 that the Trump administration's actions likely violated the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The judge's order applied to her court's jurisdiction covering much of Southern California.
The Supreme Court's order was brief and issued without any explanation, a common way it handles emergency matters, but one that has generated confusion in lower courts and criticism from some of the justices themselves. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that "apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion" but it can be a "'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors." Reuters
The court granted a justice department request to put on hold a federal judge's order temporarily barring agents from stopping or detaining people without "reasonable suspicion" they are in the country illegally, by relying on race or ethnicity, or if they speak Spanish or English with an accent, among other factors.
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision, directing pointed criticism at its conservative majority.
The administration "has all but declared that all Latinos, US citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents' satisfaction," justice Sotomayor wrote in the dissenting opinion. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent," Sotomayor added.
Los Angeles-based US district Judge Maame Frimpong found on July 11 that the Trump administration's actions likely violated the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The judge's order applied to her court's jurisdiction covering much of Southern California.
The Supreme Court's order was brief and issued without any explanation, a common way it handles emergency matters, but one that has generated confusion in lower courts and criticism from some of the justices themselves. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that "apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion" but it can be a "'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors." Reuters
You may also like
Haryana health minister conducts surprise inspection in government hospitals; says 500 doctors to be recruited to fill shortages
Bigg Boss 19: Armaan Malik Defends Brother Amaal After Nehal Accuses Him Of Touching Her Inappropriately
Charlie Kirk murder: Shooter caught in 33 hours; FBI chief gives timeline of probe
Older drivers in UK told 'do not wait' for their own protection
Jockey makes huge career decision after trading in horse racing to become Jet2 pilot
